Center for Health Literacy Promotion - Action research for effective use of health info & services
RSS Follow Become a Fan

Recent Posts

The Value of Looking through Soda Straws*
Poor reporting on health literacy blames the victim, misses the point
Mandy’s Story Part 2 A true teaching story about infant depression
Insights from the first conference on Building Children’s Nursing For Africa, Cape Town 4/17-19, 2013
Mandy’s Story Part 1 A true teaching story about infant depression

Categories

Health Literacy
Maternal Child Health
powered by

Center for Health Literacy Promotion Blog

Maternal Child Health

Insights from the first conference on Building Children’s Nursing For Africa, Cape Town 4/17-19, 2013

I conducted a pre-conference workshop  on engaging and  empowering mothers whose children are hospitalized with 15 nurse trainers and a whole class of nephrology students, we talked about the importance of basic literacy skills as the foundation for health literacy.  We reviewed screening questions that can be used to identify individuals who might benefit from adult literacy training.  One nurse said, “But using these questions, I would have to refer everyone who comes to my clinic.” Another said, “Yes,  that’s how it is.”
 
That’s how it is in some disadvantaged US communities, too.
 
This discussion, and others during my whirlwind week at Cape Town University and the Red Cross Children’s Hospital,  led to insights about the undeniable links between basic literacy skills (the 3Rs - reading, ‘riting, and ‘rithmatic), health and health literacy.
 
The 3Rs are  fundamental skills for acquiring knowledge. So it is not surprising that any way “health”  and “literacy” are defined, any way they are measured, they are inextricably linked. More literacy translates, directly and indirectly, to more health and more options and opportunities to regain, maintain and improve health, accomplish one’s goals and fulfill one’s potential. Basic literacy is the foundation for health literacy, computer literacy, science literacy, financial literacies and other “types” of literacy used to function in different social contexts. 
 
In addition, we now have hundreds of health literacy studies that show most people in most developed nations have difficulty understanding and using information to manage their health and illness and healthcare. 
 
Since health and literacy are so closely linked, healthcare organizations, especially hospitals and health plans, should consider their ethical duty and the compelling financial and practical benefits of taking the lead to improve adult literacy in their service areas. As primary prevention. As a way to increase the effectiveness of all other efforts. As the foundation for a healthy population, a pathway out of poverty and the key to the advancement of women and society.
 
Simple, inexpensive steps include collaborating with literacy enhancing services, and in their absence, establishing programs,  providing space for on-site classes, providing health content for literacy training, advocating for adequate funding, training personnel to understand and talk to patients about the role of literacy in their health, expanding Reach Out and Read.
 
Yes we rely on the schools to teach literacy. And yes, many, perhaps most schools need to do a better job. But we in Healthcare cannot reform Education; and we cannot wait for Education to reform.  To reduce the burden on healthcare systems, to improve outcomes, to increase people’s capacity to obtain the benefits of healthcare, address basic literacy in your service population.



Hamza, age 11, speaking to the conference about living with a "trachy". With him is his mother Farahna, and his nurse,  Jane Booth.

Maternal Health Literacy and Home Visitors

Since 2004, I have been training Maternal Child Health home visitors to promote maternal health literacy, defined as the cognitive and social skills and motivations that enable a mother to obtain understand and use information [and services] in ways that maintain or enhance her health and that of her child  (Renkert & Nutbeam 2000). This is the WHO definition made specific to mothers. It is broader than the US clinical definition in several important ways: it includes social skills (interactive skills) acknowledging that reading and numeracy are insufficient to function in the Information economy, especially in the high tech healthcare arena. It includes motivation, indicating that factors other than communication skills determine a persons health literacy. Perhaps most important, this broader conceptualization includes use of information. Understanding is an essential first step , but still a long way from health promoting action. Finally, it specifies using info in ways that promote health, going beyond decision making. In order to involve community health workers as Farmer and Winston and Bonnie suggest, we need to broaden our thinking.

I chose home visitors as a channel to promote health literacy for a long list of reasons, chief among them: home visitors' unique access and long-term trusting relationships enable them to observe and to influence the interactions of multiple factors that determine a mothers' health literacy.These factors are not readily visible or modifiable in a community setting.

We trained visitors to build parents'  interactive and reflective skills while providing direct assistance to make meaning from selected health education materials (Beginnings Guides) and information from healthcare providers and to apply it in vivid real life circumstances. The primary teaching and learning strategy in the intervention is reflective questioning. This does not imply that practitioners forget what they know, but rather that they use their expertise to formulate reflective questions and lead reflective conversations that facilitate self-discovery and action planning. This approach addresses the social determinants of health and the empowerment aspect of health literacy. Health literacy is empowering because, and to the degree that it enables a person to increase control over their health and its determinants.

A critical element is the routine use of data by practitioners to tailor interventions to particular families and circumstances. Many home visitation programs use the Life Skills Progression instrument (LSP) approved to demonstrate progress to federal benchmarks of effectiveness in home visitation (Maternal Infant Early Childhood Home Visitation -MIECHV under the Affordable Care Act). Using the LSP,  home visitors routinely  monitor parents' use of health information and services as well as self-care, support of child development and health behaviors important to both parent and child health (smoking, alcohol, drugs). Among these are indicators of maternal health literacy, situated in surrounding family conditions. Two health literacy scales derived from the LSP enable home visitors to monitor "healthcare literacy" - use of info and services and "self-care literacy" management of personal and child health at home. Intimate knowledge and data on  surrounding family conditions suggest approaches to improving health literacy for a particularly mother.  The routine use of data - especially where it is currently collected- enables visitors and partner researchers to consider the context in which we expect people to use health information, not as background noise, but as the primary determinant of the health literacy task, a persons capacity to accomplish the task, and the support needed.

Four studies funded by AHRQ/NICHD, National Library of Medicine and Missouri Foundation for Health indicate the intervention is effective in increasing health literacy regardless of reading ability and in spite of depression. Low maternal health literacy is associated with child developmental delays and reduced participation in early intervention.

The average American spends 1 hour per year in a clinical setting.  We need more community health workers trained to promote health and health literacy in the community in the course of their usual activities, along with routine use of data by practitioners and their supervisors to continuously increase effectiveness and sustain funding. One action step would be to review existing data sets in search of indicators of health literacy and influential surrounding conditions (eg social support, living conditions). Repeated measures would show progress/regression.   This is to suggest a paradigm shift from health education, anticipatory guidance, information giving that aims to increase knowledge and compliance to an empowerment approach that aims to increase autonomy and engagement.

Breast Milk Baby reveals nation’s low health literacy

The Nation & World section of my morning newspaper reports, right next to the story re civil war in Syria,  on a doll that is making TV conservatives squeamish. The Breast Milk Baby makes suckling sounds when it touches sensors sewn into a halter top that comes with the doll. A Fox news commentator thinks we  “don’t need this kind of stuff”.  It’s hard to say what “stuff” he’s worried about. A father says it’s “creepy”; maybe his daughter could play with the doll at home, but not on a play date or in public.
 
Seriously?
Somehow these men think breastfeeding has something to do with sex.  So the doll’s suckling sounds are  “too mature” for little girls who want to grow up to be mommies. Apparently, dressing up the buxom Barbie doll in a cocktail dress and heels for a date with hunky Ken is a better way for “kids to be kids” and for little girls to envision their future and understand the purpose of breasts.
 
From a health literacy standpoint
Critics of Breast Milk Baby are showing a  very limited ability to understand and use information for health. Breastfeeding, exclusively in the baby’s first six months, is recommended by virtually every health authority on the planet as the healthiest way to feed a baby with benefits to both mother and child over their lifetimes.  
 
Breastfeeding is only X-rated in the minds of some adults. Let’s think about what we want to teach our daughters and what we want to protect them from. What is it we want to protect ourselves from by banning a breastfeeding baby doll.
 
Good News
If you are not ‘creeped out’ by the thought of little girls learning that breastfeeding is normal, healthy and health-promoting; if you believe breasts are engineered primarily for feeding babies, and if the sound of suckling does not distract you beyond rational thought, you can order Breast Feeding Baby online at half-price. She is  more culturally competent than some of her critics; choose a doll with one of eight names, skin tones and facial features.

Breastfeeding is best.
Your milk is made for your baby. It contains the right amount of all the nutrients Baby needs.  As the baby’s needs change, your milk changes, too. Mother’s milk is easy to digest. It is always ready, clean and just warm enough. Breastfeeding creates a special bond between mother and baby. Breast fed babies have fewer infections and allergies than bottle-fed babies. And their brains develop faster.
 
Italie, Leanne, Associated Press, Breastfeeding baby doll: creepy or groundbreaking? 11.8.2012  
 

Health Education Week: Focus on Adolescent Health Teen mom’s improve their health literacy

This is Health Education Week sponsored by Society for Public Health Education. The theme is Adolescent Health. We take this opportunity to applaud the teens in our studies on maternal health literacy.
 
A study from the Center for Health Literacy Promotion and University of Washington reported in the September 2012 edition ofMaternal Child Health Journal found that pregnant and parenting teens participating in home visitation programs started at a significant disadvantage on almost every indicator of maternal health literacy, that is,  ability to use information and services in ways that maintain or enhance health. And  the teens made gains in the first six months of home visiting to nearly catch up with their more experienced counterparts. With support and education they became empowered as managers of personal and child health and healthcare. In so doing, they planted the seeds for a healthy adulthood for themselves and their babies.

Healthcare reform (ObamaCare) improving women's' health, health literacy

The Affordable Care Act "ObamaCare" requires health plans enrolling now to cover 22 preventive services for women.  The following  8 services must be covered with no cost-sharing - that means these services are not free, but ARE included in the premium, no additional charges. Especially important is that education and counseling are required services.  This opens the path for a giant leap forward in health literacy and patient-centered care.

Breastfeeding comprehensive support and counseling from trained providers, as well as access to breastfeeding supplies, for pregnant and nursing women

Contraception: Food and Drug Administration-approved contraceptive methods, sterilization procedures, and patient education and counseling, not including abortifacient drugs

Domestic and interpersonal violence screening and counseling for all women

Gestational diabetes screening for women 24 to 28 weeks pregnant and those at high risk of developing gestational diabetes

Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) screening and counseling for sexually active women

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) DNA Test: high risk HPV DNA testing every three years for women with normal cytology results who are 30 or older*

Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI) counseling for sexually active women*

Well-woman visits to obtain recommended preventive services for women under 65

See more on these plus covered services for adults and children at www.healthcare.gov

Beginnings Guides: Health Education Materials that Work

Beginnings Guides to pregnancy and parenting translate the science of prenatal care and early child development into practical guidance for parents.
 
The Pregnancy Guide, first published in 1989 as Beginnings: A practical guide through your pregnancy, is now in its 8th edition (2011). It has been distributed by home visitation programs, prenatal care providers and health insurance plans to more than 310,000 families. In surveys, mothers report sharing Beginnings with their partners, friends and relatives, and their doctors. Six  months after close
of service, nearly all mothers who participated in New Mexico’s Families First program were able to report where their copy of the Pregnancy Guide would be found. For example, one mother said, “They are stored with the newborn clothes for my next pregnancy.” Another said, “I gave it to my cousin who is pregnant.”
 
Beginnings Pregnancy Guide is not your usual pregnancy book.  Let me count the ways:

1) Conversational tone is easy, encouraging. It sounds like something you would actually say to a mother sitting next to you. The text reflects the conversations a caring, articulate, “patient-centered” practitioner who is up-to-date on the research would have with each mother at each visit if time allowed. Readability pioneer Rudolf Flesch documented that conversational tone using personal pronouns and common words increases readability and comprehension.
 
2)  Staged learning keeps info immediately applicable. Information is like
medication; it is easier to take and more effective is small doses. Adults learn in order to solve problems they have now. Information that is not immediately applicable is likely to be ignored or discarded and may be overwhelming. So the Beginnings Guides present essential information in a series of six booklets referenced by gestational age and the usual course of prenatal care. Selectively cover the content of each booklet in one or more visits depending on the family’s interests and needs and your frequency of visits.
 
3)  It’s short. Short words in short sentences in short paragraphs in short booklets increase readability, comprehension and recall. This “commitment to short” means focus is on the essentials. Even experienced mothers and educated first-timers who read everything about pregnancy welcome Beginnings’ focus on what really
matters at a particular point in pregnancy. We converted to the  8.5 x 5.5” booklets after mothers told us that format is easy to carry and store and “they don’t look or feel like homework”.
 
4) It’s designed to promote maternal health literacy.
More on that next time. ss

How to facilitate parents’ participation in literacy-enhancing services

Any way they are defined, any way they are measured, health and literacy are inextricably linked. Parents’ literacy is a determinant of child health. Low literacy is a barrier to delivery of healthcare services and home visitation services.

Achieving family goals and program goals for health, school readiness, healthy child development, and self-sufficiency depends on parents’ ability to use information and resources. For these reasons, literacy should be a priority for all MCH home visiting programs.

I have argued that reading is neither necessary nor sufficient to function in modern society, particularly in healthcare. Everyday, people who read poorly or not at all manage to access healthcare, keep a job, and raise competent children. But the fact remains, those folks are extraordinary. They have developed other skills to compensate. For most, inability to read severely restricts options and opportunities.

Literacy has long been framed as a reflection of cognitive ability so that being “low literate” bears a powerful stigma. This makes reading difficulty one of those hard-to-discuss topics that are easily skipped for fear of jeopardizing the essential and sometimes fragile visitor/family relationship.

Some of the discomfort comes from our own, perhaps unconscious, beliefs about literacy. In many communities, everyone “just knows” that low literacy is on the list of Things Too Bad Too Talk About. Home visitors tell me they do not want to embarrass parents, or insult them, or make them uncomfortable when everyone is comfortable. Breakthrough happens out of discomfort. And you, Non-judgmental Visitors, have the capacity to hold a safe space for “your” parents’ to work through discomfort and move toward higher functioning.  If not you, then who?
 
Identify parents at high risk for low literacy
The point of identification is to refer them to community-based literacy enhancing services and support their participation. All this can be accomplished in a positive, self-esteem building way. And that may be the greatest gift you can offer a family. To start, I offer two non-intrusive tools to identify parents for referral to adult basic education services, family literacy programs, or English language learning programs. No tests. No embarrassment.

 1.    Observe how many adult and/or children’s books are in the home. Or ask, How many books do you have? (They can be library books.) Research shows that parents who have at least 10 adult or children’s books get satisfactory scores on reading tests – they probably read well enough.  If you see no reading materials, that’s a signal to have the Literacy Conversation. More on that later

 2.    Use the ELF Literacy Screen. The ELF uses three questions to produce a proxy REALM score. REALM – Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine – is the most commonly used measure of reading ability in a healthcare setting. It is a word recognition test using healthcare-related terms (e.g. exercise, menopause, jaundice). The ELF was designed by a primary care physician to identify poor readers without giving them the test, which patients have reported is embarrassing and alienating. The ELF was validated with low-income parents of children to age 6 in primary care. Researchers gave the REALM test to the parents and then asked them a list of questions. Their responses to the following three questions correlated with scores indicating a reading level equivalent of < 6 grade or > 7 grade. (The average American reads at a 7 to 8 grade level). You can identify most poor readers by their response to three questions.  You might already have the info, so you won’t even need to ask. 
 
Here are the ELF questions:  (Note: the name ELF reminds you of the questions)
 
How many years of Education did you complete?
The critical answer is > 12 years; high school graduation predicts a reading level equivalent to 7 to 9 grade. No-diploma predicts lower reading ability. When a parent has not graduated from high school, this really is as far as you need to go to know that the Literacy Conversation is in order.  A perhaps easier way to ask the question is: Were you able to finish high school? In most programs, the easiest way to get the answer is to look at the record.

 Are you currently Living with your child’s other parent?
Do not read into this question. It is not to indicate that living with the father of the baby makes a woman smarter. It probably indicates some level of social support and the wherewithal to maintain a relationship. This info likely is in the record, too.

 Do you ever read books for Fun?This relates to observing the number of books in the home as described in #1 above.  
 
Interpreting the answers to the ELF Questions
A parent who has graduated from high school (or has a GED) and says Yes to at least one of the other questions probably has adequate reading skills. Others are at high risk for low literacy and may benefit by referral, support to participate in a literacy program, and direct assistance to make meaning from information and apply it in context.

A parents’ limited literacy translates to limited options and opportunities to maintain a healthy lifestyle, obtain the full benefit of healthcare, and support their child’s development. MCH home visitors, other community health workers and many clinicians can identify parents with limited basic literacy skills (reading) without testing, embarrassing or alienating them.  Once you’ve identified a parent at high risk for low reading skill, it is time for a reflective conversation. For potentially difficult-to-discuss topics like this, it is useful to have a Model Reflective Conversation as a guide. 

But wait! Before you have this conversation, it is essential to become familiar with the literacy-enhancing services in your area and establish mutually supportive referral relationships with community partners. Your partner(s) may be a public library family literacy program, literacy tutors, an adult basic education or English language learning program. It is not enough to simply have a list of resources. Visit them. Learn just what you are suggesting parents participate in. Find out how you can collaborate with program staff to support parents’ participation. If you have no literacy services in your community, direct your attention to advocacy.
 
Model Reflective Conversation on Literacy
 
Home Visitor:  You are going to get a lot of information about pregnancy and babies from your doctor, your insurance plan, andfrom me. Most of it will be in writing. Many people have trouble understanding some of the technical and medical words and ideas. Have you had any problems reading and understanding information from your doctor or clinic or other places?

Parent:No

VisitorOK good. (Leave the door open for further discussion) I’malways happy to review information with you and help figure out what is important and what it means for you and your family.
 
OR Parent:Yes

Visitor: (Reassure) Don’t worry; lots of people do. (Set up the referral) Is it just the medical terms, or do you think your reading could be better?  
 
Parent:  It’s just the medical stuff.
 
Visitor: OK good. (Leave the door open) I’m always happy to review information with you and help figure out what is importantand what it means for you and your family. (Give a practical strategy) When the doctor or nurse, or I use a word you do not understand, you can just repeat the word, like this: “Ultrasound?”  Or “Ultra what?”
 
OR Parent: My reading could be better.

Visitor: (Reflect. Discover motivations, desired outcomes) How would life be different for you and Baby if you were a good reader? Wait and listen. (Set up the referral) Would you like toget some help with your reading?

Parent: No, not now

Visitor:  (Discover barriers, fears. Plan a baby step toward participation in a literacy program.) OK, on a scale of 1-10 where 10 is Can’t-wait-to-learn-to-read-well and 1 is not-even-thinking-about-it, where are you now? What would it take to get to (next number)? How will you know you are  ready?
 
OR Parent: Yes, I’d like help with reading.
 
Visitor: (Offer Information. Keep the learner in charge of the learning.) There are some good programs in the area that other parents I know have really liked. Shall I bring you information about them?
 
You have established referral relationships with literacy enhancing services in your community. You’ve identified a parent with reading difficulties and had a reflective conversation with her about basic literacy. You’ve made the referral. Now the task is to support the parent’s enrollment and participation.
 
Plan intensive ongoing support
For the parent and family, becoming a skilled reader is going to be life-changing and relationship-altering. The process can be challenging in many personal and practical ways. Enrolling is a huge step. You can use Dynamic Tension with the parent to anticipate and plan how to meet the challenges and manage the consequences of becoming literate. Dynamic Tension, from David Emeralds’ Power of TED*, The Empowerment Dynamic  is a framework for reflective action planning. In its simplest form, the framework moves through three basic questions: What do you want? What have you got? What’s next?
 
1.    What do you want? Pick up your earlier reflective conversation about getting some help with reading where you asked something like, “How would things be different for you and Baby if you were a skilled reader?” This gets to the foundational planning question, “what do you want?” Remember, literacy skills always are used for some practical purpose. Continue this discussion until the parent has articulated in detail her best possible desired outcome – the practical purposes of her reading. In challenging times ahead, you will want to reflect back to her this primary motivation and her progress toward her vision of her new future as a skilled reader.  
 
2.    What have you got? Next, assess current reality. Questions for the parent include, What will help you make this happen? (social support, especially from family; encouragement, time to practice, money, child care, transportation). What might get in the way of you participating in the program? (fear, embarrassment, resistance of partner). What support will you need? Whom can you ask for that support? How will you ask? Want to practice?  
 
3.    What’s next? Now we get to action – and anxiety. The essential question is: What baby step can you (the parent) take this week? A baby step is a small do-able action that has no previous steps and is the parent’s to do. (If you do it for her, you rob her of learning, experience, success). You may find there are preliminary steps. Perhaps the parent needs to get glasses first, or to learn to ride the bus, or find reliable childcare, or all these things. No matter. Keep her focused on what she wants, and ask which of these prerequisites she wants to start with. Maybe you’ll decide the first baby step toward being a skilled reader is to arrange a vision test. Offer assistance (“I know a good optometrist; would you like his contact information?”) but resist the temptation to speed the process by doing what is hers to do.  
 
4.    Hold the tension. The dynamic tension, anxiety, arises as soon as she says out loud what she wants. It raises the possibility of failure. Tension increases as you assess current reality together because it points to the distance between reality and the goal. Her natural tendency will be to relieve the tension by letting go of the goal  (“I don’t really need to read any better”). To support the parent in following through on the referral to literacy-enhancing services, keep her “eyes on the prize” by reflecting back to her the outcome she wants, her strengths and supports, and her progress. Keep her taking one baby step after another, building success and confidence along the way, becoming a problem solver, taking charge of her life. Remind her and yourself that two steps forward and one step back is still progress; and each baby step has the potential to be a quantum leap. You will both be amazed by what she can accomplish.  
 
Support Enrollment
You’ve referred a parent to a literacy enhancing program. Together you and the parent used Dynamic Tension to put her focus squarely on her vision of her future as a skilled reader. She has completed preliminary steps and organized the necessary supports.  Now the day has come and she is ready to enroll. This step is the scariest.
 
New readers talk about driving around the building for hours; or walking to the door and then back to the car over and over again before finding the courage to walk in and say out loud, “I need help”. They say the biggest fear is finding out that they really are stupid. Before they enroll, they can say the school system failed them. But if they go to the literacy program and don’t succeed; that would prove that their parents and teachers and others who said they are stupid were right.
 
Since many programs rely on volunteers and are underfunded, the parent might encounter an unskilled teacher, or one who does not recognize a learning disability. So it is important to become familiar with programs you refer to (literacy programs for non-readers and up to about 5 grade level; adult basic education beyond that). You will want to know about the intake process and how the program manages learning disabilities.
 
Literacy expert, Audrey Riffenburgh of Plain Language Works, offers these ideas to support a person in the enrollment process. First, think of ways you can ease the anxiety and build confidence:
 
§ Consider putting together of group of parents who could attend together and might evolve to a study group and support group. 
 
§ Whom to call? Just the thought of making an appointment to enroll is anxiety producing. Offer the contact information along with a picture of a friendly waving person – ideally the person she will talk with when she calls, or meet when she enrolls.
 
§ How to get there? You can use a Google map and insert photos of landmarks and places a person might get lost if they cannot read the road signs.
 
§ What to expect? Make the experience as predictable as possible by reviewing usual processes, and remind her that it might not happen exactly as planned.
 
§ Arrange to meet the parent at the enrollment site, if possible. If you go, and you know the person behind the desk, you can introduce the parent. But your job is to stand by. Do not speak for her. 
 
§ Congratulate her. Reflect back to her the strengths she demonstrated in completing
§  this huge baby step.
 
§ Discuss her next baby step toward literacy.
 
Support does not end here. This is the beginning of the beginning. Closely follow her progress. Invite her to read aloud to you from the Beginnings Guides or information from the doctor or community resources. Encourage her to read aloud to the Baby who will love hearing her voice and not care about mistakes. As soon as she becomes discouraged or misses a class, check with the director of the program for help discovering and addressing the problem. Your continued interest and consistent attention indicates the importance of the challenge and your belief in her ability to succeed. Your persistent support is a gift that could transform their lives.  
 
 
References:
Baker, D.W., Parker, R.M., Williams, M.V., Clark, W.S. & Nurss, J. (1997).The relationship of patient reading ability to self-reported health and use of health services. American Journal of Public Health, 87 (6), 1027-1030.

Bennett, I.M., Robbins, S. & Haecker,T. (2003). Screening for low literacy among adult caregivers of pediatric patients. Family Medicine, 35, 585-590.

Chew, L. D., Bradley, K. A. & Boyko, E. J. (2004). Brief questions to identify patients with inadequate health literacy. Family Medicine, 36, 588–594.

Emerald, David. (2009). The Power of TED* The Empowerment Dynamic. Polaris Publishing, Bainbridge Island WA.

Garcia, C.H., Hanley, J. & Soufrant, G. (2008). A single question may be useful for
detecting patients with inadequate literacy.Journal of General Internal Medicine,23(9)15

Building the Bike While Riding It

Action research identifies best practices for promoting
maternal health literacy
 
Following is a brief summary of findings from our program
of action research* with home visitation programs that have
been trained to use Beginnings Guides and the Life Skills
Progression to support reflective practice and promote
 
Home Visiting (MECHV) is an effective channel to promote
maternal health literacy,
Overall mothers (N=2572 including 23 men and a few grandparents)
who participated in enhanced home visitation for 12-18 months
achieved significant improvement in their use of information and
services for health.
 
Promoting Maternal Health Literacy reduces disparities
Additional findings suggest the intervention reduced disparities
related to literacy and age:

•   Lower skilled readers made greater gains than their more
     skilled counterparts.

•   Teen mothers started at a major disadvantage but made
     impressive gains in the first six months of service to nearly
     catch up with their more experienced counterparts.
 
Depression and Maternal Health Literacy closely linked

•   Both depressed and not-depressed mothers improved their
     management of personal and child  health and healthcare.
     Depressed mothers made greater gains than not-depressed
     mothers, again reducing disparities.
 
Depression does not interfere with health literacy promotion efforts

•   Depression improved slightly but significantly over the service
    period. Home visitors were successful in supporting mothers to
    overcome multiple barriers to obtain depression treatment,
    demonstrating increased understanding and utilization of health
    services -- that’s health literacy. Major improvements in health
    literacy occurred even when changes in depression were minor,
    suggesting the effect on health literacy is separate from the effect
    (full text free online).
 
Maternal Health Literacy may predict child developmental outcomes
Preliminary findings from our current study on the same database as
the above studies suggests maternal health literacy is closely related
to child development, so that efforts to promote health literacy also
promote child development.  Stay tuned.  
 
Is it feasible and effective to integrate health literacy promotion
into Medical Home Outreach?
This question is being addressed over the next two years with
Anthem/WellPoint as it pilots the intervention in 12 state Medicaid
managed care organizations.  WI is up. TX is next.
Stay tuned.
 
Integrating health literacy promotion into Parents As Teachers 
curriculum is feasible and effective
That is the preliminary finding from the Parents As Teachers Health
Literacy Demonstration Project that winds up this summer. The
participating Parent Educators and other stakeholders will review
and interpret the results at a Reflection Conference May 11.
Stay tuned. 
 
*  Action research, sometimes called “practitioner research”,
is a reflective process in which practitioners undertake research
to improve their own practice by learning from experience.
The process identifies ineffective practices to drop; promising
practices to hone and finally  best practices to disseminate. 

See Forest, M.E. & McNiff, J. (2007). Learning and teaching in action.
Health Information and Libraries Journal, 24, 222-226.
 
 

Breastfeeding Recommendations & Maternal Health Literacy


Reports have been circulating on the Internet: researchers find that the recommendation to exclusively breastfeed babies for six months is just too hard for modern women and is making mothers feel bad. The study author suggests the advice is fine for the developing world, but should be changed to “breastfeed as long as you can and introduce solids as close to six months as possible”.
 
There are several health literacy lessons to be learned from this questionable reporting on questionable research.
 
The evidence is exceptionally clear and strong
FIrst, we should note that the recommendation to feed infants only breast milk for at least six months is not just a suggestion from some guy in a diner. It is the evidence-based consensus from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, American Academy of Pediatrics,  the World Health Organization, and virtually all health agencies on the planet. This level of consensus is rare and requires an extremely strong evidence base.
 
Is the recommendation unhelpful for mothers?
The evidence exists for a long list of health benefits to mother and child that last a lifetime and save billions in healthcare costs. The study’s author says the recommendation is “idealistic” and “unhelpful”  as an individual goal and calls for balance between these “theoretical” long term benefits and immediate family well being. Fair enough. But that can be done at the individual level without undoing worldwide policy making and without concluding that women are incapable of (or just too busy) for this womanly skill.
 
The perfect food is free
The big problem for breastfeeding is this: it’s free. This study feeds a broadly-held perception that breastfeeding is for poor people in backward countries that cannot afford or reliably use formula.
 
With this twisted thinking we are willing to disregard all the science behind the global breastfeeding recommendation in favor of the belief that in 30 years scientists have made a better formula than what Mother Nature developed over millennia.
 
According to the World Health Organization, Maternal Health Literacy means the cognitive and social skills which determine the motivation and ability of mothers to gain access to, understand, and use information in ways that promote and maintain their health and that of their children. 
 
Part of health literacy for mothers, health promoters and clinicians alike, is reading critically, asking where is this information coming from and how reliable is it?  What does it mean to me in my situation? How can I use it for health?
 
Read it for yourself.  The study is published in BMJ Open - that’s British Medical Journal Open, an open access journal.
 
BMJ ought to be a reliable source. But here’s the detail that matters (it’s in the abstract): 541 pregnant women in Scotland were invited to participate in monthly interviews; 72 volunteered to participate. Of these, 36 were interviewed along with some of their partners and relatives.
 
This is not a representative sample. People who volunteer to participate in surveys typically feel very strongly one way or the other. We need to ask, how are these 36 women different from the 505 who declined?  Further,  the sample is too small to draw any conclusions beyond the individuals involved.
 
Telling them what to do does not work
Breastfeeding advocates, health educators, parent educators, home visitors, clinicians can learn an important lesson re promoting maternal health literacy from this article. When education is perceived as “unrealistic, overly technical and rule based”, it is not going to motivate anyone to take action for health.  But you already knew that...  The problem here is not the breastfeeding policy; it’ s the delivery of information. Stay tuned for a model reflective conversation to promote breastfeeding.
 
To balance the oft quoted Scottish mothers who were not well served by their lactation consultants and who struggled with breastfeeding, see our Facebook Poll for comments from our volunteer sample of mothers who work in women’s health. We asked: Do you think recommending breastfeeding for a minimum of 6 months is unrealistic or unattainable? No one said Yes.
 
 

2nd and 3rd Hand Smoke Harms Child Health throughout Life

Betty, a parent educator presented a challenging case in
reflective supervision. She reported that the 19-year old
mother and her seven month-old daughter live with her
mother. And Grandma smokes like a chimney. Mom smokes,
too. She’s begun making efforts to smoke outside. But
Grandma says to Mom, “I smoked all through my pregnancy
and your childhood; you didn’t die, and neither will this
child”. She bristles at any request to stop smoking or take
steps to protect the baby.

I have a lot of respect for grandmothers and their wisdom
(I am one!). But this time, this grandmother is just plain
wrong. Her smoking probably will not kill the child this
year, and hasn’t killed the mother yet,  but it might kill
them both before their time.

Second-hand smoke is as harmful as first hand smoke,
and more so for an infant with small size and still-developing
lungs. Exposure to second hand smoke has been linked to
increased risk of SIDS, ear infections, and respiratory disease
in children.  Annually, 150,000 to 300,000 cases of bronchitis
or pneumonia in children under 18 months of age are attributed
to second hand smoke.  And new research reported by the
journal Respirology this week shows that a child’s reduced
lung function from exposure to second-hand smoke nearly
doubles  the risk of lung disease in adulthood.

Mom smoking outside does begin to reduce harm to the
baby by reducing the second hand smoke in the air that
Baby breathes. Betty, the  home visitor rightly praises
this effort and continues to encourage Mom to take the
next step. Mom is in a bind because she needs a safe
place to live. And, for now, living with her mother is her
best option. She has set a goal to get a job so she
can get her own place. She is taking courses for a college
degree. It’s a long path to her goal.  Meanwhile, Betty
reports, she takes the baby to the doctor  “all the time”
for recurring colds and ear infections.

Third-hand smoke is as harmful as first hand smoke,
too.
What makes Grandma’s house hazardous to Baby’s health,
in addition to smoke in the air from her current cigarette,
is the accumulation of smoke in the furniture, curtains,
carpet, bedding, dust; in her hair and clothes, and in her
car. This is third-hand smoke. It toxins remain toxic. Baby
has her face in it all the time. Information on third-hand
smoke will be added to the upcoming 4th Edition of the

Rating Moms and Grandma’s Health Literacy
Betty has made certain that both Mom and Grandma have
plenty of information about smoking and resources to
support quitting. Both understand the information. Grandma
rejects it outright. She warrants a low score of 1 (dysfunctional)
on the  “Use of Information” item in the Life Skills Progression
Maternal Health Literacy Scale. She has low health literacy,
not because she can’t read, but because she does not
use information and resources for health.  

Mom’s health literacy is increasing. With Betty’s support
she has come to recognize the risk to her child, if not to
herself. She has established a medical home for the child
and seeks care appropriately. She has begun to take action
to change her living situation in order to improve her health
and that of her child. In this case, the barrier to health
literacy promotion is not the mother’s reading skill, it is
the grandmother’s beliefs.  

Promoting Health Literacy
Betty planned to keep bringing information on smoking
to each visit with this family, as she has for a year now,
and continue to do whatever she can to “get them to
stop smoking”. When we reviewed the mother’s  goals
and motivations - she aims to complete her schooling
so she can get a job so she can move to a more healthful
environment - a different approach emerged that is likely
to be more effective and less frustrating for all parties.

Betty has been trying to fix the family and rescue Baby
by getting Mom and Grandma to stop smoking.  If she
could shift from pushing for her own goal to supporting
what Mom wants for herself and the baby, she could
build on Mom’s motivation to graduate and get a job,
celebrate smoking outside and going to school as steps
in the right direction, and support Mom’s step-by-step
progress toward independent living and a smoke-free
environment for her and Baby.

Epilogue
At the end of the case presentation, we learned the baby
had just been taken to the local ER with seizures and
airlifted to the regional medical center. We cannot say that
second- and third-hand smoke caused the seizures, but the
evidence is clear that smoke in an infant’s environment
weakens lung function and increases other health risks.
Mom is right. Time to move.

References
Winickoff JP, Friebely J, Tanski SE, et al. (2009). Beliefs
about the health effects of “third hand smoke and 
home smoking bans. Pediatrics 123: e740e79.

Chan S.& Lam TH. (2003). Preventing exposure to second-hand smoke.
Seminars in Oncology Nursing 19 (4): 284-290

MedlinePlus Secondhand Smoke in Childhood Linked to Lung
Disease Years Later
(available until 6/17/2012)

Website Builder provided by  Vistaprint